RiGi / RiGi Group
AI Audit: Trustworthiness Assessment
Start with one defined AI workflow. Examine the evidence for what it can do, where human authority belongs, and what needs attention before wider use.
AI Audit · Trustworthiness Assessment
One workflow. A clearer evidence position.
Start with a working session to set the boundary. Then examine the evidence, controls, and decision authority within an agreed scope.
Discuss an AI Audit ↗90 minutes
Triage and scope the workflow.
10 daysProposed initial assessment after scope agreement.
The sequence
From a useful first question to a reviewable decision
- 01Working session — define the use case, owner, effects, and evidence available.
- 02Evidence review — examine claims, system behavior, control points, and exceptions.
- 03Findings — distinguish supported observations, unknowns, and material gaps.
- 04Decision path — identify owners, priority actions, and evidence to collect next.
What you receive
A bounded assessment package
Evidence and gap register
Risk and exception priorities
Recommended decision path
Deliverables and timing are confirmed with the actual scope. The review is advisory; it does not constitute certification or independent assurance.
Common questions
Know the boundary before you begin
What happens in the 90-minute session?
We define one workflow, its stakeholders, decision effects, and available evidence.
What does the proposed 10-day effort cover?
It reviews evidence, decision authority, controls, and material gaps for the agreed workflow. Timing depends on access and scope.
Is this a certification?
No. It is a scoped advisory assessment with findings limited by available evidence.